biofuel | Search Last Month Search Last 6 Months Search All Messages | Search Since this date: | biofuel Home NNYTech.net |
| 53806 1969-12-31 ed:Message-ID:From:To:References:S.. | 53821 1969-12-31 ed:Message-ID:From:To:References:S.. |
| 53834 1969-12-31 ed:Message-ID:From:To:References:S.. | 53966 1969-12-31 ed:Message-ID:From:To:References:S.. |
| 53998 1969-12-31 ed:Message-ID:From:To:References:S.. | 54045 1969-12-31 ed:Message-ID:From:To:References:S.. |
| 54047 1969-12-31 ed:Message-ID:From:To:References:S.. | 54077 1969-12-31 ed:Message-ID:From:To:References:S.. |
| 54084 1969-12-31 ed:Message-ID:From:To:References:S.. | 54091 1969-12-31 ed:Message-ID:From:To:References:S.. |
| 54103 1969-12-31 ed:Message-ID:From:To:References:S.. | 54115 1969-12-31 ed:Message-ID:From:To:References:S.. |
| 54126 1969-12-31 ed:Message-ID:From:To:References:S.. | 54138 1969-12-31 ed:Message-ID:From:To:References:S.. |
| 54158 1969-12-31 ed:Message-ID:From:To:References:S.. | 54308 1969-12-31 ed:Message-ID:From:To:References:S.. |
| 54381 1969-12-31 ed:Message-ID:From:To:References:S.. | 54396 1969-12-31 ed:Message-ID:From:To:References:S.. |
| 54541 1969-12-31 ed:Message-ID:From:To:References:S.. | 54574 1969-12-31 ed:Message-ID:From:To:References:S.. |
| 54577 1969-12-31 ed:Message-ID:From:To:References:S.. | 54581 1969-12-31 ed:Message-ID:From:To:References:S.. |
| 54582 1969-12-31 ed:Message-ID:From:To:References:S.. |
Message #54084 of 54591 
| Previous Message | Next message | Next in thread |
Date: 1969-12-31
From: Message-ID
Subject: ed:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Trans
From: Message-ID
Subject: ed:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Trans
lt 2003Yes, they claim it, they also claim it reduces emissions and improves engine
efficiency, reducing fuel consumption while producing more power.
TINSTAAFL.
7500 miles that is 1 gal of water for 125 hrs at 60 miles an hour.
Over 3 weeks 40 hr weeks.
If their device is that good, then they have no need to use diesel in the
first place. Even if a big rig is getting 20 mpg, that's 375 gal of fuel.
So now we are supposed to believe that some device will improve efficiency
when water is broken down to O2 and H2 applied to fuel at a rate of 1/375?
Even if the water is free, you are saving about $.01 a gal.
If the device only cost $4000, your going to have to burn 400000 gal of fuel
to break even.
Used only distilled water and works down to -40* C below? Must be some
strange kind of new type of distilled water that that doesn't start to
freeze at 0* C.
Distilled water is a poorer conductor than water with some types of
impurities in it.
Someone is blowing smoke, but, I doubt it is the diesel trucks.
Greg H.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Darryl McMahon"
To:
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 18:03
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] truckers choose hydrogen power
> The company (CHEC) claims they use about 4 litres (just over a U.S.
> gallon) of water in 12,000 km (7,500 miles). In a tractor trailer, that
> seems trivial to me.
>
> Darryl McMahon
>
> Greg and April wrote:
> > The water may be more plentiful, but, it still takes up volume and mass.
> >
> > 1 gal of water weighs about 8.35 lbs. and takes up 231 cubic inches
> >
> > So 90 gal weighs over 750 lbs and takes up over 12 cubic ft.
> >
> > That's a lot, of extra weight and volume being taken up.
> >
> > I can't help but wonder if the water is being doped with alcohol - it
would
> > increase the amount of H2 per unit of liquid, and IIRC, increases
> > conductivity of the water, not to mention decreasing the temperature of
> > freezing solid.
> >
> >
> > Can anyone confirm the effects of electricity through alcohol?
> >
> > Greg H.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Zeke Yewdall"
> > To:
> > Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 16:31
> > Subject: Re: [Biofuel] truckers choose hydrogen power
> >
> >
> >
> >>Hmmmm. Well, considering that they go through 100 gallons of diesel
> >>fuel in an 8 hour day, and water (even clean water) is way more
> >>plentiful than diesel), that actually doesn't seem that bad if it
> >>allows saving maybe 5% of the diesel fuel.
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Biofuel mailing list
> > Biofuel.org
> >
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org
> >
> > Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
> > http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
> >
> > Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000
messages):
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel.org/
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Darryl McMahon http://www.econogics.com
> It's your planet. If you won't look after it, who will?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Biofuel mailing list
> Biofuel.org
> http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org
>
> Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
> http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
>
> Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000
messages):
> http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel.org/
>
>
_______________________________________________
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org
Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel.org/