piclist | Search Last Month Search Last 6 Months Search All Messages | Search Since this date: | piclist Home NNYTech.net |
| 72987 1969-12-31 Re: [EE] Wire wrapping insight nee.. | 73000 2005-03-08 RE: [EE] Wire wrapping insight nee.. |
| 73004 2005-03-07 Re: [EE] Wire wrapping insight nee.. | 73008 2005-03-08 Re: [EE] Wire wrapping insight nee.. |
| 73029 2005-03-07 Re: [EE] Wire wrapping insight nee.. | 73033 1969-12-31 [EE] Wire wrapping insight needed!.. |
| 73074 2005-03-07 Re: [EE] Wire wrapping insight nee.. | 73102 2005-03-07 Re: [EE] Wire wrapping insight nee.. |
| 73116 2005-03-08 Re: [EE] Wire wrapping insight nee.. | 73140 2005-03-07 Re: [EE] Wire wrapping insight nee.. |
| 73145 2005-03-07 Re: [EE] Wire wrapping insight nee.. | 73183 2005-03-06 Re: [EE] Wire wrapping insight nee.. |
| 73186 2005-03-07 Re: [EE] Wire wrapping insight nee.. | 73201 2005-03-07 Re: [EE] Wire wrapping insight nee.. |
| 73213 2005-03-07 Re: [EE] Wire wrapping insight nee.. | 73218 1969-12-31 Re: [EE] Wire wrapping insight nee.. |
| 73226 2005-03-07 Re: [EE] Wire wrapping insight nee.. | 73228 1969-12-31 Re: [EE] Wire wrapping insight nee.. |
| 73240 2005-03-05 Re: [EE] Wire wrapping insight nee.. | 73247 2005-03-07 Re: [EE] Wire wrapping insight nee.. |
| 73260 1969-12-31 Re: [EE] Wire wrapping insight nee.. | 73266 2005-03-07 RE: [EE] Wire wrapping insight nee.. |
| 73280 2005-03-07 Re: [EE] Wire wrapping insight nee.. | 73325 2005-03-08 Re: [EE] Wire wrapping insight nee.. |
| 73333 2005-03-06 Re: [EE] Wire wrapping insight nee.. | 73341 2005-03-08 Re: [EE] Wire wrapping insight nee.. |
| 73367 2005-03-07 Re: [EE] Wire wrapping insight nee.. | 73386 1969-12-31 Re: [EE] Wire wrapping insight nee.. |
| 73387 2005-03-06 Re: [EE] Wire wrapping insight nee.. | 73397 2005-03-07 Re: [EE] Wire wrapping insight nee.. |
| 73404 2005-03-07 Re: [EE] Wire wrapping insight nee.. | 73408 2005-03-07 Re: [EE] Wire wrapping insight nee.. |
| 73436 1969-12-31 Re: [EE] Wire wrapping insight nee.. | 73437 2005-03-06 Re: [EE] Wire wrapping insight nee.. |
| 73465 2005-03-07 Re: [EE] Wire wrapping insight nee.. | 73487 1969-12-31 Re: [EE] Wire wrapping insight nee.. |
| 73495 2005-03-08 Re: [EE] Wire wrapping insight nee.. | 73496 2005-03-07 Re: [EE] Wire wrapping insight nee.. |
| 73506 2005-03-06 Re: [EE] Wire wrapping insight nee.. | 73523 2005-03-05 Re: [EE] Wire wrapping insight nee.. |
| 73543 2005-03-07 Re: [EE] Wire wrapping insight nee.. | 73545 2005-03-07 RE: [EE] Wire wrapping insight nee.. |
| 73549 2005-03-07 RE: [EE] Wire wrapping insight nee.. | 73562 2005-03-07 RE: [EE] Wire wrapping insight nee.. |
| 73563 2005-03-07 RE: [EE] Wire wrapping insight nee.. | 73592 2005-03-06 Re: [EE] Wire wrapping insight nee.. |
| 73603 2005-03-07 Re: [EE] Wire wrapping insight nee.. | 73607 2005-03-07 Re: [EE] Wire wrapping insight nee.. |
| 73614 2005-03-06 Re: [EE] Wire wrapping insight nee.. | 73615 2005-03-06 Re: [EE] Wire wrapping insight nee.. |
| 73628 2005-03-08 Re: [EE] Wire wrapping insight nee.. | 73629 2005-03-07 Re: [EE] Wire wrapping insight nee.. |
| 73632 2005-03-06 Re: [EE] Wire wrapping insight nee.. | 73635 2005-03-07 Re: [EE] Wire wrapping insight nee.. |
| 73641 2005-03-06 Re: [EE] Wire wrapping insight nee.. | 73650 1969-12-31 Re: [EE] Wire wrapping insight nee.. |
| 73672 2005-03-07 Re: [EE] Wire wrapping insight nee.. |
Message #73213 of 126777 
| Previous Message | Next message | Next in thread |
Date: 2005-03-07
From: William Chops Westfield
Subject: Re: [EE] Wire wrapping insight needed!
From: William Chops Westfield
Subject: Re: [EE] Wire wrapping insight needed!
On Mar 6, 2005, at 7:28 PM, Jake Brownson wrote: >> Mr Design, go for it. Us 'ole guys have been proven wrong before... >> I am not afraid of being proven wrong...I can take it. > > So what do you "ole guys" use for prototyping? PCBs. At $100 or less for a prototype board (actually, several boards) and less than a week turnaround, WW doesn't make sense. And that's supposing you don't make your own PCB. (do you know how little engineering time, or even technician time, you can buy for $100?) (At some professional engineering level, the prototype boards have fine pitch packages and 12 layers, and the need to use a PCB for the prototype as well as production is "obvious." The point is that it makes a lot of sense for smaller circuits, too. I spent some significant dollars on an LPKP circuit board router (mechanical etching thing) so that I could go from computer to finished board at a high level of 'convenience.' I'm still not sure it was a good idea. I think in the several years I've owned the machine, I could have had every board I've made as a hobbyist on it (which is not as many as I'd like, but still) made professionally and still had money left over... Arguably, back when WW was common, designing PCBs took more skill than WW (hey, places hired high schools students like me to do WW on prototypes, but the PCB layout guy was a skilled ancient :-) But now there are cheap (or free) high quality packets like CadSoft Eagle, and I don't think that it's a lot harder to come up to speed with Eagle than it is to come up to speed from nothing with WW, especially if you're talking about a 20MHz design and needing twisted pair. I WW'ed my senior design project, but that was three or four chips on the periphery of an 5Mhz (?) system. I WW'ed a keyboard encoder (ala TV Typewriter cookbook) that was perhaps a dozen SSI chips. And the aforementioned summer job in HS. None involved twisted pairs. I'd be real nervous using WW with signals that ran faster than about 2MHz. The rats-nest vs neatly-routed wire argument is somewhat controversial. The job said "be neat" (but things were slower then.) The "serious" designs allegedly tell you what length of wire to use for each connection, cause the wire's delay is part of the system design. (Cray-1 backplane, for example.) debugging is simplified with a neater layout, I think. You can combine techniques. Lay out the high frequency parts, power, and decoupling and parts of the design that are "certain" on a PCB, then use WW sockets for an wrap the rest. This gives you the sort of 'evaluation board' that many vendors now offer. And in fact I've seen an increasing number of projects in the 'senior design project' class built on top of such evaluation boards (which is yet another possibility.) BillW -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist